|
By Vasilis Katos, MEng, MBA, PhD
Security Architect, Cambridge Technology Partners, The
Global eServices Company of Novell Inc.
Email: katosv@yahoo.com
Abstract
This paper discusses the attitude of both
e-businesses and e-customers or perspective e-partners
towards the risks which are born by using the Internet
as the communication channel. The risks are highly correlated and shape the trust of an e-customer
towards an e-business. Starting from the organization's attitude towards risks, a number of
criteria that influence the customer's trust are presented.
Introduction
On November the 2nd, 1988, the Internet
suffered from a systematic attack from the "Internet
worm" [1]. The day after was named as "Black Thursday"
because approximately 70% of the interconnected
systems were out of order. This event triggered the
systematic attempts to add security operations to the
Internet, which was regarded as the most successful
medium of information offer and retrieval. In fact,
security issues had never been mentioned before the
attack of the worm.
Twelve years later, at the dawn of the twenty first
century, history repeats itself on a different scale.
The popular site yahoo.com experiences a denial of
service (DoS) attack and thousands of users did not
have access to their electronic postboxes. Some days
later, a known financial institution that provides web
banking to its customers, allowed users to access all
customer records due to a programming error. Such an
event was a clear breach of confidentiality and it
appeared after an upgrade of the web banking software.
Several months ago the NIMDA worm toured around the
Internet, with the ability to affect systems that used
Microsoft's email products and the Microsoft web
server, IIS.
Analysis
There is a fundamental difference between the
operation mechanisms for the 1988 worm and the attack
at yahoo.com. The worm leveraged the internet
protocols in combination with the discovered
vulnerabilities of the operating systems; the majority
of hosts were running under Unix. In the case of
yahoo.com, the attack was based solely on the
vulnerabilities of the internet protocols and more
specifically on the TCP handshake stage.
The DoS mentioned above could have been executed
with success at most Internet sites, since confronting
such an attack is difficult and requires a coordinated
effort of a number of components, including an
intrusion detection system, cooperation and timely
response of the Internet Service Provider, as well as
availability and instant response of the site
administrator. Yahoo.com was probably selected for the
attack because it is one of the most popular and
commercially successful sites, with the potential to
affect thousands of users. Therefore a successful
attack would give a greater satisfaction to the
attacker than a less popular site. Of course the
attack could have been mounted from - or behalf of -
competitors or from parties who could have financial
gain, but this has not been established.
It can be argued with a considerable degree of
confidence that the security of the interconnected
systems is much higher than the security of the
systems that operated twelve years ago. Today a
firewall is a typical network component which is
exposed to the public network. Furthermore, many
organizations have approved the Internet to be used as
the channel to reach their customers, partners, or
employees. So why do large scale security related
problems are still in the picture? Why do these
security breaches make us realize that the perceived
security level of our system is much higher than the
actual security?
The answers can be found in the common
characteristics of the two epochs we are comparing.
The main characteristic is the very existence of the
Internet: the need for interconnection. No matter how
many security measures are placed, there must always
be a port open, our electronic reception to serve our
customers. The Internet has become an entity which has
developed immunity to various assaults, but remains
vulnerable to new ones. As in pharmaceutics research
and development is needed for the creation of new
antibiotics to treat the new diseases, similar
activities are required to deal with the new threats
in Cybespace, i.e. the creation of new defense
mechanisms.
One other common characteristic of the two epochs
is the perception of the security issues and the "it
cannot happen to me" syndrome. This characteristic is
also apparent in the health sector with the numerous
education and awareness campaigns, which aim to change
the culture of the public towards some diseases. There
is an analogy between a company dealing with IT
security issues and a human dealing with health
issues. There exist companies which do not consider
security to be an important matter and react only when
they are affected. There are companies which have a
knee-jerk reaction and pay high prices in order to
cure their system. However, there are also
"hypochondriac" companies who believe that are
constantly under attack and consume their resources in
order to apply every possible solution which is
available on the market, without considering its
applicability and usability. Finally there are
companies who have taken the appropriate prevention
measures and also react with prudence in the case of a
security breach.
An important conclusion is derived from the above,
with respect to dealing with Internet risks and
consequently with trusting the Internet, since trust
and risk are terms which are highly correlated and can
be interchanged. The conclusion is that a statement
like "I do (not) trust the Internet" is not
applicable. The Internet is an information propagation
medium and therefore it would be unfair to tax with
its operation means. Besides the Internet was not
designed with security in mind. On the contrary, trust
must be referred to the companies and more generally
to the end systems with which we perform transactions.
When we feed our credit card number in an electronic
form and send it to buythebook.com, the SSL security
protocol which is supported today by all browsers, is
adequate to preserve the confidentiality of the credit
card number during its transfer over the Internet. The
real security problems arise by the time the number
arrives at the systems of buythebook.com, where we do
not know the number of locations our credit card
number is stored, the location of the database(s), as
well as who has access to the database(s), whether she
is a company's employee or an external party and in
general how the company is dealing with this sensitive
information.
Consequently, in order to have cooperation and
eventually a sustained relationship between an
e-business and a customer, the former must meet the
trust expectations of the latter. In the world of
e-business the characteristics which influence and
shape the trust of an organization include:
- The presence history of the site. As a rule of
thumb, the older the site the higher the trust. This
can be combined with the fact that if the site belongs
to a successful and known company, then the presence
history is expanded.
- The site's attack history and the company's
reaction towards the attacks. More specifically, the
company's response time following a security related
event is an indication of the organizational readiness
towards external threats. Furthermore, when multiple
sites suffer synchronously from advanced attacks, the
response and recover time is a very important
differentiator.
- The existence of a privacy statement, as well as
the existence of the security policy statement. These
statements must be placed in easy-to-reach locations,
without requiring the user to consume considerable
time to track down the links to these statements.
- The application of the security policy. Although
the procedures and security mechanisms of the systems
must be transparent in order not to discomfort the
legitimate user, from a trust perspective the presence
of the security mechanisms is essential. For example,
the existence of a password policy could be succeeded
with a respective web page educating the user about
the password rules (e.g. minimum number of characters,
denial of use of names, etc.)
- The financial and accounting information of the
company.
Conclusions
Although there are risks associated with the use
of the Internet as the enabling technology for doing
business, most of them can be mitigated with an
organised and systematic security investment,
including both technology and organisation. Since
these risks depend on the security awareness and
responsibility of the underlying e-business
organisation, it follows that trust should refer to
the organisation rather the internet itself.
A number of characteristics which indicate the
security behaviour of a company were listed. However,
this list cannot be complete since it is generic and
not industry specific, and also the e-business
environment is dynamic.
References
[1] Don Seeley, A Tour of the Worm, http://packetstormsecurity.nl/papers/virus/tour.ps
Vasilis Katos recieved the MEng degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the Democritus University of Thrace in Greece in 1994, the MBA degree from Keele University, UK in 1995 and also received the PhD degree in Computer Science from Aston University, UK in 2000. Since 1999, he has been working as a Security Architect for Cambridge Technology Partners, the Global eServices Company of Novell Inc.
He has taught several seminars on IS security and has been a member of the Scientific Comitee of the 4th European Forum in Business Management (2002) held in Thessaloniki and Athens, Greece. Dr. Katos is also a member of the Academic Comitee of the Athens Graduate School of Management - Nottingham Trent University. His research interests are cryptography, e-business security and risk management.
|
|